Airfarewatchdog
Welcome!
  • Real deals from your departure city
  • Verified by our Dealhounds

Confessions of a fat fingered airline pricing analyst

rss link Airfarewatchblog


Confessions of a fat fingered airline pricing analyst

Posted by George Hobica on Thursday, March 5, 2009

Brett Snyder is currently the force behind Crankyflier.com, a web site that comments on the airline industry. But for several years, he was one of the hundreds of folks who work in the pressure cooker atmosphere that is the lot of the airline airfare analyst. These are the people who decide how much you'll be paying for your next flight. They watch what their competition is doing, and react as quickly as possible to match or beat what other airlines are charging. And sometimes--less than they used to, thanks to new technology--they make mistakes.

We asked Brett to give us an idea what it was like to work in this fast paced environment. Here's what he told us:

Indianapolis to Santa Barbara.  It's not a big market, and I've never actually flown it, but I'm fairly sure it's responsible for turning at least a few of my hairs gray.  See, when I graduated from college, I decided to become an airline pricing analyst.  While I never filed a zero dollar fare, I did file at least a couple of fares that were way too low--"fat finger fares".

You wouldn't think that many people would actually want to fly between Indianapolis and Santa Barbara, but sure enough, all I needed to do was file an absurdly low $52 roundtrip fare and plenty of Midwesterners came out of the woodwork.  There was one travel agent who must have found the fare and called fifty of his friends, because he accounted for a substantial number of the bookings within just a few minutes.  It didn't take long for us to find the errant fare and fix it, but the damage had been done.  Fortunately, more damage was done to my ego than to the airline itself.

It might surprise you to know that I didn't get in trouble.
  In fact, filing your first mistake fare was considered a rite of passage.  You just hoped the revenue loss wasn't too bad.  Even if it did turn out to be minor, you knew you'd never live it down.  I think our director reminded me of that mistake at least once a week until the day I left, but that ribbing was always accompanied by a grin.

Despite that accepting attitude, working in the world of airline pricing is not easy.  Nearly every airline submits its fares to a central clearinghouse called the Airline Tariff Publishing Company (ATPCO) in Washington, DC.  Airlines can submit fares to ATPCO whenever they want, but the fares are only compiled and "released" by ATPCO three times every weekday (10 AM, 12.30 PM and 8 PM Eastern) and once per day (5 PM Eastern) on the weekend.  When those fares are released, the reservation systems (Sabre, Galileo, Amadeus, etc.) pick up the changes and enter them in their own data bases.  Massive amounts of revenue could be lost if you missed a single filing for an important fare change, so time is always of the essence.

Since my airline was based in the West we were under extra pressure, since the release times were based on the Eastern time zone.  During the summer, we had to be at work by 6 AM so we could review the changes from the night before.  We only had an hour to get our first set of fare changes in before the 7 AM Pacific Time (10 AM Eastern) deadline.  After those fares were filed, we'd see what every other airline did during that morning's release, evaluate the changes, and file many more fare changes of our own for the 9:30 AM deadline.  It wasn't unusual to see thousands of fare changes for our airline alone during a single release on a busy day.  The mornings were just insane.

It got even worse when a new sale was launched or some other major change occurred.  ATPCO's release normally would go out within 10 minutes of the 7 AM deadline once all airline changes were compiled, but major fare changes caused it to be delayed by a half an hour or more.  If we saw the delay, we knew we had to take quick action.  It was almost impossible to get ATPCO to postpone a future release for more than a few minutes, so we rarely had enough time to catch up.  We just had to work fast.

The afternoons were a different story.  Once our 9:30 AM deadline passed, there wasn't another one until the end of the day, so we could spend our time working on longer term projects and markets that weren't as critical to the bottom line on an individual basis.

Fortunately for us, our airline bought a software application that allowed us to really do things quickly.  Each analyst had a set of markets assigned, and when we arrived in the morning, all the changes in our markets would be waiting in our individual queues.  We naturally paid attention to the markets where we had the most revenue at stake.  Being uncompetitive in those markets could have a much greater impact than in a market like, oh, Indianapolis to Santa Barbara.

Under that kind of pressure, you had to know where to focus and what moves to make. 
Sometimes, it was best to not make any moves at all and see how things played out, but you always wanted to make sure you had a reason for why you did or did not take action.

It's no surprise that fare mistakes can happen in such a fast paced world, but the improvements in our technology made it less common. There were checks that flagged fares that seemed too low or even too high, for that matter.  I think I filed a $99,000 fare one time, but of course nobody would have ever noticed something on that end of the spectrum. Technology has improved even further since my days in the pricing department, which is why you see fewer "fat finger fares" now than you used to.

There really was an extraordinary rush of adrenaline when you were trying to get your fares filed in time for the next deadline.  It made for a very fun and unique work experience that I will certainly never forget.

 

Categories: Airfarewatchdog News

Post a Comment


(Please do not use your real name - this screen name will be your public identity on Airfarewatchdog.com)
(Your email address will not display in post)



ok if you like moaning about airline fares then have a laugh instead....if airlines sold paint http://www.hesstravel 'dot'com/press_releases/airline_paint_article.pdf
by empee on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
What a poorly written article. All this talk about "filing fares' and not a word about how those fares are determined. That's what I wanted to know. What is a flagged fare? What is ATPCO? If you're going to write an "insider" article, then at least define your industry jargon. I know as little about how airfares are determined as before I read this.
by Dogzilla on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
hi ... nice informative post to get insights on what goes behind the scene for pricing analysts ... I have recently been introduced to pricing world of airlines ... i would be keen to connect with you to get some insights on the Pricing DSS for Airlines ... will you be able to share your mail id where I can reach you?
by sid on Tuesday, July 27, 2010
To tenmonkeys - I'm happy to learn there are humans working as as RM analysts, and not that the computer is doing it all. To be honest, it's my "learning" this fact I'm happy about, not the fact itself.

In any event, your comments about "sale" fares sort of conforms what I always suspected. It comes down to airlines filing sale fares they hope the public never finds, but if they do, they won't have to sell. Then, why ever file it in the first place? It results in 20 different fares in a single market of which only the "Y" fare, the "rack rate" is really there for all to take. And then, with 20 fares, you manage the "buckets," even though you already established a host of restrictions that would apply without the "bucket" shenanigans.

As to the level of average fares, I'm sure you appreciate most of us are not buying fares "on average." We buy a single fare we hope is the lowest we can find and meets our needs. And, whether it's below the airline's cost, well...!

Honestly, most of us don't want to see any airline go bankrupt, and we don't sit around thinking up ways to get airline people to lose their jobs. We need the airlines, but it seems so many things they do, such as with fares and the complexity of their fare structures, just flies in the face of good customer relations.

End of rant, and thanks for your comments.

by wonrus7 on Thursday, March 12, 2009
wonrus7 - All good points, too. The airline that I work for requires us (in case you can't tell, I am a RM analyst) to make a certain % of a sale fare class available before they advertise it. So the scenario where only 2 seats on a 777 have been sold, but the sale fare is unavailable (if applicable) - really should never occur. That said, it doesn't always happen perfectly and I'm sure that sales do go out for zero (or close to) zero availability markets...and, yes, this is definitely a customer service issue.

In other cases, the sale happens so quickly that seats are snatched up by agencies or other customers - and it's not reasonable to expect the airline to sell every seat at a sale price, which is often BELOW cost.

We also monitor customer complaints - including complaints related to lack of availability; so, always feel free to write a letter to your favorite (or not so favorite) carrier when you have specific examples of this happening. The airlines need the bookings (especially these days!) and want to make sure that customers are booking travel.

I do appreciate that the system (especially with the legacy carriers which have very complicated pricing structures) is confusing- and is not ideal as far as customer service and perception of what is "fair" pricing goes; but it really does lower the average fares across the board for our customers.

by tenmonkeys on Wednesday, March 11, 2009
wonrus7 - Yes, pricing, and even yield analysts are real live humans; and this "customer-unfriendly endeavour" as you call it is what allows airline's to maintain razor thin profit margins (when there are positive profits) and keep airfares low.
By the way, most other industries revenue manage in some form or another. Hotels, retail, restaurants, cell phone providers...it just may be more subtle (lunch menu pricing vs. dinner menu pricing vs. Happy Hour; or free weekend/nightime vs. charged for day time minutes). And if you use the argument that lunch is a different product than dinner or Happy Hour; well - then, isn't buying a ticket to go to St. Thomas for Christmas a different product than, say, buying the same ticket to go during hurricane season? Or buying a ticket 6 months out vs. 3 days out when it's more likely that you will change your mind and not travel at all?
I can definitively tell you that customers would pay much higher fares if there were no revenue management whatsoever.

by tenmonkeys on Wednesday, March 11, 2009
tenmonkeys - Appreciate your comments. Yes, I've heard the arguments many, many times. I guess the 2 points I would make is (1) that airlines seem to make more effort than most industries to hide their discounted prices, and (2) even when a potential customer somehow manages to find the discounted fare AND meet every condition attached to the fare, the industry, meaning the airline, can willy-nilly decide to not sell it through "capacity-controls." All legal, but so distastful to a potential customer.

Coincidently, UA this week decided it would no longer send out emails listing their weekly discounted E-Fares. This past couple of months they couldn't even get the lists to show on their basic web site. To me, one more example of an airline deciding to take steps to "hide" fares. Not that they are totally hidden, but just another example of the seller not really wanting to make them too public.

Also, the public is totally turned off by "yield management." "Yes, you met all the conditions of the fare, but...! True, we've only sold 2 seats on that 777 flight, but still nothing available in the "V" bucket." Scream!!!!

by wonrus7 on Wednesday, March 11, 2009
As maybe the only private person ever to subscribe to the ATPCO domestic fare tariffs (pre-dereg.) and maintain his own private set of tariffs, which surely led to the loss of a number of beautiful North American forests, I love hearing air fare stories. Then, came deregulation and the use of computers and the internet. Double the trouble!

Just my opinion, but I think Hell will have a special section reserved for air fare pricing analysts, next to the one for yield/inventory management anaysts (assuming real live humans are involved in this customer-unfriendly endeavour).

Anyway, enyoyed the story!

by on Monday, March 09, 2009
"It didn't take long for us to find the errant fare and fix it, but the damage had been done."

2 days later?

by Hmmmm on Monday, March 09, 2009
Yes! More please! Even though we have not paid for a flight in 27 years, I constantly read this site for ourselves and all of our friends of all ages. This was an eye opener. Even if we only use FF miles, most of our friends do not. So searching for the best deals for friends is a tiny gift I can give to help them travel.
by Di Pri on Sunday, March 08, 2009
For those of us active analyst(s), we will carry on the torch!
by StillActive on Friday, March 06, 2009
StillActive: Please share some of your war stories! We're all ears!
by on Saturday, March 07, 2009
I was wondering where those blooper fares had gone, and now I know. I bought several tickets from Watertown, NY to LA, Vegas, SFO and other places for 88 cents a few years ago when US Air had its famous fat finger fare fiasco.
by Robber Barron on Friday, March 06, 2009
© 1998-2012 Smarter Travel Media LLC. All Rights Reserved Privacy Statement | Terms of Use
Advertisement
http://rd.airfarewatchdog.com/?ad_user_tracking=%5Bsource%3D%2Ctaparam%3D%2Csupmt%3D%5D