Airfarewatchdog
Welcome!
  • Real deals from your departure city
  • Verified by our Dealhounds

Flying with Fido

Travel Q&A

You can submit your own question to us at askgeorge@airfarewatchdog.com. We will try to answer as many as possible. If we use your question in a future newsletter, we will send you a free Airfarewatchdog T-shirt. We do not print your name or other details in our newsletters.

To post a comment to one of our Q&A's please click on "read more" and then "post a comment."

Current posts | Categories

Flying with Fido

Q. I am traveling to Oregon this summer and would like my dog to fly with me. Will this be possible, and will it be expensive? 

A. It really depends on your airline. Some allow small pets to fly in the cabin, as long as they're in a kennel that fits under your seat (and the kennel counts as your one allowed carry on item.) Other airlines will have you check your dog and fly him in the cargo hold below, and a handful of airlines (including Frontier) refuse to transport pets entirely, although Southwest recently reversed its no pets in cabin policy and now carries them for a $75 each way fee. 

As far as costs go, flying pets doesn't come cheap. Even in cargo, it's possible that your dog's fare could exceed your own. For those traveling to Europe with a larger animal, the kennel services of Cunard's Queen Mary 2 may turn out to be cheaper than flying cargo, although the crossing takes almost a week. For pet fees by airline, visit the Airfarewatchdog airline fee chart. 

Pet owners who travel might also want to investigate Pet Airways, set to begin flying mid-July. Pet Airways allows pets ("pawsengers") to fly in the cabin, where they receive much more attention than if they were crammed in the underbelly of the plane with the golf clubs and the surfboards. Unfortunately, owners are not allowed to fly with their animals.


Post a Comment


(Please do not use your real name - this screen name will be your public identity on Airfarewatchdog.com)
(Your email address will not display in post)



many more allergens in people's carry on bags especially if those people smoke. talk about poison on their breath and their clothing, I'd take a cat or a dog , even rabid, next to me before a smoker - thirdhand smoke is real...these people should have to shower and wear masks if they smoked within 8 hours of flying. Give me a good dog anyday; too bad smokers end up killing people all around them.
by luvstotravel on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Pet deaths while flying have been reported in the news from time to time, but for the person who wants research, here are a couple of web sites. http://abcnews.go.com/Business/BusinessTravel/story?id=5566746&page=1
http://www.petflight.com/pet-travel-reports

True, not all died while inside the plane but you get some idea of the risks involved. It's interesting that the ASPCA recommends against flying with pets, especially as cargo.
http://www.aspca.org/pet-care/pet-care-tips/air-travel-tips.html



by Kyhornplayer on Thursday, July 09, 2009
Oh yeah, that heated discussion also went on at Consumerist when Southwest announced small pets could ride in the cabin. I'm not going to start it here, but you can read it (and see where my opinion lies) here: http://consumerist.com/5277534/southwest-to-allow-small-pets-in-the-cabin-for-75
by azsumrg1rl on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Why do airlines change anything for pets that accompany the passenger in the cabin? When I take my pet, it sits at my feet in a carrier, in lieu of a carry-on. The airline doesn't handle my pet at any time, doesn't feed my pet, doesn't provide any service at all. Usually no one knows my pet is even on board. So why am I paying $80 or more each way? For many years now, when I book my fare on the phone, I've asked the agent to explain what I receive in return for the $80 per flight. So far, not one has been able even to fake an explanation. It's outrageous that airlines treat customers this way. No wonder we all hate airlines. They deserve it. Unfortunately, so long as every airline adheres to the same unjustified policy, there's no reason for them to change from it. Passengers with pets are treated badly on all airlines.
by flashfeld on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
I have never been asked to pay $80 for my carry on luggage. But my carry on luggage doesn't poop, doesn't whine or howl or meow, it sits in the overhead or the underseat. My carry on luggage doesn't eat, it doesn't cause allergic issues for passengers, it just sits in the overhead or underseat.

Now, maybe your pet sleeps the entire flight, but that is NOT necessarily the case. Airplanes are designed (just barely) for people, not for pets. It's not that pet owners are treated badly. It's that people who want to inflict their pets on others must pay for the privilege of doing so.

I own two cats. I would not take either of them on a plane, because I care for my pets, and pets do NOT like travel. I also try to have consideration for others when I'm on a crowded airplane, and bringing my pet is inconsiderate.

As for the poster who claimed pet deaths, etc from flying in the hold...do some research before you make such claims, please.


by mickisue on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
However disabled passengers who require the support of a service animal must be allowed to have their dog in the cabin with them. Service animals are not confined. Passengers with severe allergies of any kind should be equipped with emergency medications when travelling and especially so by air since recycled cabin air cannot be guaranteed allergen free.
by gwen10100 on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Caution is advised for anyone thinking of allowing a pet to fly cargo. It can get very hot or cold (at altitude even in the summer), there can be pressure and oxygen issues and some pets have died or been injured. I'm no expert, but anybody thinking of flying with a pet should do some serious research to be sure that the animal will be safe.
by Kyhornplayer on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
I have just heard a very heated discussion about allowing pets in the cabin - there are people with severe allergies who need urgent medical care when in a plane which has (or has had) cats in it. I feel that for health reasons pets should not be allowed in the passenger cabin.
by sarajana on Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Advertisement
© 1998-2012 Smarter Travel Media LLC. All Rights Reserved Privacy Statement | Terms of Use
Advertisement
http://rd.airfarewatchdog.com/?ad_user_tracking=%5Bsource%3D%2Ctaparam%3D%2Csupmt%3D%5D