Airfare Watchdog
Welcome!
  • Real deals from your departure city
  • Verified by our Dealhounds

Should airlines charge for carryon bags and not for checked ones?

rss link Airfarewatchblog


Should airlines charge for carryon bags and not for checked ones?

Posted by George Hobica on Friday, June 20, 2008

Here's an idea: Instead of charging for checked baggage, why not charge for carry-ons instead? That's what Mark N. Katz suggests in this article. With passengers rethinking those bulky carry-ons to avoid such a fee, security lines and boarding times could be seriously reduced. So which one would you rather pay (and no, smarty pants, 'neither' isn't an option here)? Checked bag fees that passengers will probably try to avoid by feverishly stuffing as much as possible in a carry-on, which could lead to longer security lines? Or a carry-on bag fee that could potentially reduce wait times? But don't let us sway you. Tell us what you think in our latest reader poll.

And if you're old enough to remember, back in the good old days of flying, there was no such thing as carryons. Airlines just had basically hat racks to put your coat and hat on, and no bins that closed. You were only allowed to bring one of those cute little airline flight bags you see sold on eBay sometimes. And a little reading matter, and a camera. That was it. Maybe we should go back to the good ole days.

 

What do you think? Leave some comments below!  I've copy pasted some of the emails we've already received on this topic, below.

----------

In response to your survey question about which I would prefer a fee for checked baggage, or a fee for carry-on. Checked baggage might be a viable option if the airlines had a better track record of making sure my baggage arrived when I did at my destination. At least with carryone (or my favorite plane side check-in) I know my belongings will be where I am and not sitting in the baggage area of another airport.

----------

 

I would much prefer that the airlines charge for carry on bags. If they did, maybe I wouldn't get hit in the face by overloaded backpacks as often!

 

 

-------

Concerning charges for checked baggage on airlines, I much prefer that travelers be charged for carryon baggage! Not the ladies' handbags or reasonably sized tote bags/computer cases, but suitcases! I don't know how many times I've waited forever in the aisle being unable to get to my seat awaiting someone trying to stuff their suitcase(s) into an overhead bin. Fully agree that charging for checked baggage will create even more of that type problem!

---------

 

Regarding the article about charging for carry on's - No Way! I carry one bag and a laptop bag and I do not want to trust my stuff to the checked baggage nightmare. My bag fits on the regional jets like CRJ50's so I defnitely don't overstuff it nor hold up the crazy security lines... I travel too much for that kind of headache!

 

---------

 

Charging for carry-on instead of checked baggage - I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA. Pass it on ....

-----------

I would prefer first checked bag be free and first carry on be free. Charges would only for second bags, checked and carry on

 

----------

Since we only use one carry on bag per person and do not check any bags this would not be a good solution for us. To make it equal for everyone, have all passengers put all their luggage on a scale and have it weighed along with the passangers weight.

------------

Yes, why the heck didn't the airlines determine charging for carry-on luggage would be a better option than charging to check luggage? Mark N. Katz couldn't of spelled it out any clearer! Now the airport security lines (searches) will taken even MORE time to get through. Charging passengers to check their carry-on luggage is only the beginning of yet more airline travel nightmares!

 

----------

I like the idea of charging for carry-ons and allowing the first checked bag free! I am usually traveling with both a computer bag and a clothing bag that would fit overhead. But, I don't travel enough anymore to warrant preferred boarding, so that means a race to find a place for ANY carryon! Why not charge those who travel for business on a regular basis and prefer to carry on? They're usually on expense accounts and can charge the fees back to their companies. Besides, even if I can find a space for a carry-on, I'm short and not as strong as I was when I traveled on business. The baggage charge is also a real deterrent to any traveler who is less than perfect or physically fit. That's discrimination! Maybe AARP should take up this cause for older travelers.

------------

I think charging a fee for carry-ons is great idea. Let everyone bring on a briefcase and/or purse no charge, but check everything else.

 

 

Categories: Airline Industry News

Post a Comment


(Please do not use your real name - this screen name will be your public identity on Airfarewatchdog.com)
(Your email address will not display in post)


I just got back from a trip to Florida and back. I really do not understand the logic the airlines are using for this excessive baggage charge. My 1 suitcase weighed 65 pounds, which was 15 pounds over Delta's limit and they charged me $80 for this. They suggested taking out some things and putting into my carry on, but I don't like carry ons, i dont want to carry around my luggage all day.

But what is the difference anyways. If it is 1 bag that weighs 65 pounds or 2 bags that weigh 65 pounds together, they are still on the same plane right? I do not understand their logic. While other passengers are allowed to bring in 2-3 carry-on bags that probably weigh more than my 1 checked baggage and they dont get charged.

Plus there is overweight passengers....

So I weigh 180, my bag weighed 65 and i had no carry on, a total weight of 245 and I get charged an extra $80.

I then observed a 250 pound woman that carried on 2 bags that probably weighed 10-20 pounds each, plus the baggage that she checked that was around maybe 35 pounds. A total weight of 305-325, and this person doesnt get charged.

It is all about saving fuel for these airlines but their logic does not make sense.

How about total weight of the passenger plus ALL (carry-on and checked bags) luggage? If that is over a certain limit than charge them extra.

If you want to reply to me about being mean to fat people that pack too much than be my guest. But it is not their fault I just want some equality in the airlines messed up logic.

by eqaddix on Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Passengers will all try to bring only a carry on. There will be no room for every passenger to bring a carry on. If the airlines are going to charge for for luggage then the only fair thing to do would be to charge for both checked and carryon bags. There has to be rules in place and enforced regardng carryons. Size and weight restrictions are necessary all the way around. I also think passengers without carry ons should exit the aircraft first. The the rest of them can clobber each other retrieving their bags from the overhead compartments. A frustration that has nothing to do with bags is paying for a flight and ending up in a seat that does not recline,broken connection for earphones and stinky dogs or screaming children and oversize neighbors. along with exit row passengers with no intention of doing what the seat assignment requires.
by Carol on Thursday, June 26, 2008
I believe that charging for on-board baggage would be great.
I 've seen alot of people that don't even have the body strength to put them in the bins. But some nice passenger will help.
I figure if you can't put in there, you need to check it.\!!
So Maybe we need a test before security that has you pick the bags up over your head. You fail, you check.

Another way to discourage this, would be to have a separate line for anything that rolls and beyond the limit of one handbag and/or computer bag...
Just my two cents

by Jim from Dallas on Thursday, June 26, 2008
Yes, please charge for the carry on bags, excluding lap topbags, purses. Then people won't try to carry on their oversized bag and take 1/2 hour to stuff it in the overhead compartment.That is why the late take offs occur. As for luggage down below, always have done it and have only been lost once but got it back. Been Flying for 35 years. So people Deal with it.
by Laurie on Thursday, June 26, 2008
I think airlines should charge for checked luggage but not for carry-on`s. Airlines should be able to try and make money and I think we should be concerned when taxes are excessively larger than the fare itself.
by Harold Williams on Thursday, June 26, 2008
I've had my checked luggage lost too many times and it costs a lot to buy things to wear until the airline finds your bag. Then you have to go back to the airline to retrieve it once it's found, if it's found. We don't get reimbursed for that. Therefore, I pack lightly in one carry on that's an allowable size and put it in the bin over my seat. I have had to check my small carry on because by the time I get to my seat, someone else has stuffed their items in my bin. Airlines need to enforce the already established rules of ONE carry on a certain size and ONLY allow it to be stowed above that passenger's seat. Anything extra should have to be checked, no exceptions. This would also make boarding much faster, as passengers who are assigned to seats in the back of the plane would not be allowed to stop up front to stash their bags obove seats that are not assigned to them.
by LauraJ on Thursday, June 26, 2008
If people stuck to the size limit allowed for carry on luggage AND placed the bag above their own seat instead of above the first seats when they're sitting in back, there wouldn't be a problem with boarding and fitting all luggage. Airlines should enforce that instead!
by Laura on Thursday, June 26, 2008
Haven't you heard Peter Greenberg? There are 2 types of luggage...carry on and lost!
by Dianne on Thursday, June 26, 2008
The carry on bagage is already totally obnoxious, both size-wise and quantity- wise. Even after stuffing their excessive crap over other peoples seat these people also hold up the deplaning process because they will not wait for other to deplane before they barge their way toward the various places their carry ons are stuffed. CHARGE THEM, not the first checked bag, and ENFORCE THE SIZE restrictions.

This is so obvious there should be no question. Comments to the contrary are probably from the same people who carry on and make everyone else wait for them.

by Dick on Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Hmmmmmmmm......So are we paying for checked luggage to offset the rising fuel costs or for the new luggage police American Airlines is employing to enforce the rules?
by Karla on Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Advertisement